Why simpler computer simulation models can Be epistemically better for informing decisions
model calibration
uncertainty quantification
ethical-epistemic values
Links
Abstract
For computer simulation models to usefully inform climate risk management, uncertainties in model projections must be explored and characterized. Because doing so requires running the model many times over, and because computing resources are finite, uncertainty assessment is more feasible using models that demand less computer processor time. Such models are generally simpler in the sense of being more idealized, or less realistic. So modelers face a trade-off between realism and uncertainty quantification. Seeing this trade-off for the important epistemic issue that it is requires a shift in perspective from the established simplicity literature in philosophy of science.
Meme
Citation
@ARTICLE{HelgesonEtAl2021,
title = "Why Simpler Computer Simulation Models Can Be Epistemically
Better for Informing Decisions",
author = "Helgeson, Casey and Srikrishnan, Vivek and Keller, Klaus and
Tuana, Nancy",
journal = {Philosophy of Science},
volume = 88,
number = 2,
pages = "213--233",
year = 2021,
doi = "10.1086/711501",
}